Gesell v. Commonwealth Edison Co.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SCOTT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Leonard Gesell and Lathan Montgomery’s Motion for Class Certification (d/e 24).1 For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ Motion is DENIED.
Commonwealth Edison (“ComEd”) is a large utility which provides electricity services to customers in northern Illinois. In the 1990s, ComEd had four large areas of business concentration: (1) customer service, (2) generation, (3) transmission, and (4) distribution. The generation section was divided into fossil fuel and nuclear generation sections. Plaintiffs Gesell and Montgomery…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Pedro De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., Marcelino Vasquez and Albert Solis, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- In the Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Rosario v. LivaditisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tootle v. Arinc, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- George v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Pope v. Harvard Bancshares, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Pfahler v. National Latex Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
- Flanagan v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.