Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Mille Lacs County Sheriffs Department
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 23, 2002No. Civ. 98-2658(RLE)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
At Duluth, in the District of Minnesota, this 23rd day of August, 2002.
I. Introduction
This matter came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to the consent of the parties, as authorized by Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), upon the Motion of the Mille Lacs Tribal Police Department, Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians, and Marc R. Gabiger (collectively, “the Tribal Defendants”) for Summary Judgment. 1 A Hearing on the Motion was scheduled for April 11, 2002, but the parties agreed, prior to the Hearing, to submit the Motion on the…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hester v. Redwood CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Jackson v. Shoshone-Bannock Correctional FacilityDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2021
- Jackson v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribal Justice CenterDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2021
- Jackson v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Counseling Family Service IHSDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2021