Foster v. State

VOIGT, Chief Justice.

[11] Following a jury trial, Balynda Kay Foster (the appellant) was convicted of numerous drug-related crimes. The appellant appeals the convictions, alleging that the district court abused its discretion by admitting two letters into evidence and alleging that cumulative error occurred. Finding no abuse of discretion in admitting the letters into evidence and finding that no cumulative error occurred, we will affirm.

ISSUES

[12] 1. Did the district court abuse its discretion when it admitted into evidence letters purportedly written by the appellant and the appellant's…