People v. Spiegel
Criminal Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Paul G. Feinman, J.
Defendant moves to dismiss the accusatory instrument on the ground that it is facially insufficient. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion is denied.
A misdemeanor information is sufficient on its face when it has both an accusatory part designating each and every offense charged and a factual part containing a statement of the complainant that alleges facts of an evidentiary nature that tend to support the charges (CPL 100.15 [2], [3]). The nonhearsay allegations must provide reasonable cause to believe that the defendant committed the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. TodaroNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- People v. NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- People v. CarcelNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. DonnarumaCity of New York Municipal Court · 2012
- People v. MichieCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2016
- People v. WienclawValley Stream Justice Court · 2000
- People v. Blair, New York County Courts2000
- People v. FordCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2016