Nobles v. State

Nobles was convicted of tbe offense of furnishing intoxicating liquors to a minor, without first obtaining written authority from the minor’s parent or guardian. A motion for a new trial was made on the usual general grounds, that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, etc. The motion was overruled, and the movant excepted.

1. It is insisted by the solicitor-general in his brief that the writ of error in this case should be dismissed as the brief of evidence was not approved by the trial judge. The “act to regulate and prescribe certain matters of review procedure and practice in the courts…