Smith v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Accusation of furnishing liquor to minor; from city court of 'Wrightsville — Judge Kent. April 3, 1915.
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, J.
1. “Generally the word ‘liquor’ implies intoxicating liquor, and, therefore, proof that a defendant sold ‘liquor’ is sufficient to show, in the absence of adverse testimony, that he sold intoxicating liquor.” Carswell v. State, 7 Ga. App. 198 (66 S. E. 488); Howard v. State, 7 Ga. App. 61 (65 S. E. 1076); Lewis v. State, 6 Ga. App. 779 (65 S. E. 842); Tompkins v. State, 2 Ga. App. 639 (58 S. E. 1111); Wilburn v. State, 8 Ga. App. 28 (68 S. E. 460).
2. Whether the accused believed that he was dealing with an adult and not a minor was a question for the jury. Nobles v. State, 14 Ga. App. 480,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tompkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Carswell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Wilburn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Sammons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- State v. . HickeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Clay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Humphrey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.