Allen v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
1. “ No question as to the sufficiency of the approval of grounds of a motion for new trial, or of the approval of the brief of evidence, or of the filing thereof, can be entertained by the Court of Appeals, where the judge has finally passed upon the merits of the motion for new trial, unless the question was first raised and insisted on’before the trial judge. Acts 1911, p. 149; Collins v. State, 12 Ga. App. 635 (77 S. E. 1079). See also Nobles v. State, 14 Ga. App. 480 (81 S. E. 370.)” Chicago & Northwestern Ry. v. Elliott, 16 Ga. App. 388 (85 S. E. 615); Mooty v. Butler, 25 Ga. App. 121…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cæsar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Mayor of Gainesville v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Tice Co. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Childers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Kapplin v. SeidenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Davis v. McKenzie Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.