Legal Opinion
City of Oklahoma City v. Hamilton
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 8, 1999No. 90,737PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARL B. JONES, Chief Judge:
¶ 1 The sole issue presented in this eminent domain case is whether the trial court correctly allowed the jury to include in the condemnation award, in addition to the value of the condemned land and building, the costs which the landowners incurred to move property owned by others which was located there. We hold, under the circumstances of this case, that the additional award was proper.
¶ 2 Appellant City of Oklahoma City [City] commenced this action in 1995 to acquire a piece of property near the “Brick-town” section of the city for use in one part of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Williams Natural Gas Co. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Blincoe v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Lawrence v. SchellstedeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Finley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Kelly v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- State ex rel. Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority v. United States Beef Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002