Legal Opinion

Penn Steel Foundry & Machine Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1988No. Appeal No. 1292 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Kalish,

Penn Steel Foundry and Machine Company (employer) seeks review of the opinion and order of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board), affirming the referee, which granted the fatal claim petition of the claimant, Ruth R. Wagner. We affirm.

Claimant seeks compensation for the death of her husband, David Wagner (decedent), alleging that he died as a direct result of an occupational disease.

The employer contends that the fatal claim petition should fail because decedents death did not occur within 300 weeks of the last exposure, pursuant to section 301(c)(2) of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Ciabattoni v. Birdsboro Steel Foundry & Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Roschak Et Ux. v. Vulcan Iron WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Toffalori v. Donatelli Granite Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Kujawa v. Latrobe Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sporio v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. City of McKeesport v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Miletti)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Antonucci v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Richards v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Auto Service Councils of Pa., Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API