Legal Opinion

State v. Hurteau

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 25, 2002No. 2001-183-C.APublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The defendant, Paul Hurteau (defendant), appeals a conviction for resisting arrest, arguing that the trial justice improperly refused to issue a jury instruction explaining an arrestee’s right to defend himself against an arrest effectuated with excessive force. Because we discern no error in the trial justice’s refusal to issue the instruction, we affirm. This matter came before the Court for oral argument on October 1, 2002, pursuant to an order directing both parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised by this appeal should not summarily be decided. After hearing the…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GrundySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  2. State v. GomesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
  3. State v. GelinasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  4. State v. RamsdellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  5. Carillo v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. ImbrugliaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  2. State v. JohnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  3. State v. AdefusikaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  4. State v. IbrahimSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  5. Contois v. Town of West WarwickSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API