Parramore v. State

Bernes, Judge.

Following a jury trial, Clint Edward Parramore was convicted of one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, OCGA § 16-11-131 (b). On appeal, Parramore challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction, arguing the State failed to prove that he possessed a firearm. Finding Parramore’s claim of error to be without merit, we affirm.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict. Green v. State, 244 Ga. App. 565 (1) (536 SE2d 240) (2000). We neither assess the credibility of the witnesses nor…