Legal Opinion

In Re the Arbitration of Doyle & Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 20, 1998No. 22617-1-II, 23787-3-IIPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Sean Doyle arbitrated his underinsured motorist (UIM) claim with his insurance carrier, Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Company (MOE). The claim arose out of a five-car accident caused, according to the arbitrators, by the negligence of a phantom vehicle (50 percent), an uninsured vehicle (25 percent), and a vehicle insured by Safeco (25 percent). The arbitrators found that Doyle was without fault. Doyle had settled with Safeco before the arbitration for less than the 25 percent allocated to Safe-co’s insured. Further, Safeco’s liability limits exceeded the total amount of Doyle’s award. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Washburn v. Beatt Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. FarmerWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Price v. Farmers Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Price v. Farmers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Phillips Building Co., Inc. v. AnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. BobicWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. BobicWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. McInallyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API