Legal Opinion
Brady v. Dill
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 16, 1998No. CIV. A. 96-11405-NGPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GERTNER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a case of mistaken identity which led to an arrest and detention. The plaintiffs, William Brady and Theresa Brady, (“plaintiffs”) seek to hold the defendant members of the Massachusetts State Police force and Rockland Police force — Sergeant Maryann Dill (“Dill”), Trooper Kenneth J. Hudson, Jr. (“Hudson”), Trooper Thomas Majenski (“Majenski”), Trooper Douglas Mendes (“Mendes”), Trooper Steve Vrona (“Vrona”), and Colonel Charles Henderson (“Henderson”) — jointly and severally liable…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brady v. DillCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Cox v. Massachusetts Department of CorrectionDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- McDermott v. Town of WindhamDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2002
- Neville v. Classic GardensDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2001
- Brady v. DillCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.