Legal Opinion
Hindman v. Greenville Hosp. Sys.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided November 20, 1996No. C/A 6:95-2942-21PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TRAXLER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Polly Hindman (“Hindman”) instituted this suit pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), see 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e-2000e-17 (West 1994), the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), see 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12218 (West 1995), and the common law of South Carolina against Defendants Greenville Hospital Systems and Greenville Memorial Hospital (collectively, “Defendants”). In her first claim, brought under Title VII and the ADA, Hindman posits that the Defendants discharged her in retaliation for filing an administrative complaint…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jackson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Dilmar Oil Co., Inc. v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1997
- Roy v. RunyonDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1997
- Taliaferro v. Associates Corp. of North AmericaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1999
- Allen v. Michelin North American IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.