Allmond v. Akal Security, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Wilbur Allmond appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Akal Security Inc. and the Attorney General on his discrimination claims under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq., and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Believing that the affirmative business-necessity defense applies here, we affirm the judgment.
BACKGROUND
The United States Marshals Service is responsible for securing the federal courts. 28 U.S.C. § 566(a). To fulfill that mission, the Marshals Service contracts with private companies, like Akal Security, to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Robert Drago v. Ken JenneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Lillie R. Battle v. Board of Regents of GACourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Earl v. Mervyns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Mark Anthony Moses v. American Nonwovens, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Watson v. City of Miami BeachCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Charles Silberman v. Miami Dade TransitCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Hennagir v. Utah Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Tw Ex Rel. Wilson v. School Bd., Seminole, Fla.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Bender v. Norfolk Southern Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Franklin Owusu-Ansah v. The Coca-Cola CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.