Legal Opinion

Ratarsky v. Ratarsky

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1989No. 1476PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This is an appeal from the order of the Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas entered pursuant to the court’s broad equitable powers in divorce cases, 23 Pa.S.A. § 401(c), directing the appellant, Jack Ratarsky, to pay the appellee, Lillian Ratarsky, 50% of the cash surrender value of the life insurance policies which were held in trust by the parties. Upon review, we find that the trial court abused its discretion and exceeded its authority. Accordingly, we vacate the order and dismiss appellee’s petition.

The record reveals the following facts: On February 7, 1986, the parties’…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Simpson v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Bleakley v. BarclaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. McEvoy v. Quaker City Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Fenstermaker v. FenstermakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stockton v. StocktonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Hassick v. HassickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Bjerke v. Bjerke, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County2008
  4. Koval v. Koval, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County2009
  5. Nathan v. Nathan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API