United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion & Order
CARMAN, Judge.
The United States has moved under US-CIT Rule 59 for reconsideration of the Court’s January 28, 2010 Opinion and Order and the accompanying Judgment for Defendant, United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc., 34 CIT -, 686 F.Supp.2d 1337 (Jan. 28, 2010) (“Post-Appeal Decision”). The challenged decision followed a decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”), United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc., 575 F.3d 1376 (Fed.Cir.2009) (“CAFC Decision”), which partially vacated and partially remanded this Court’s earlier Judgment for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Intercargo Insurance Company F/k/a International Cargo & Surety Co., (Surety for M. Genauer) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Pam, S.P.A., and Jcm, Ltd. v. United States, and A. Zerega's & Sons, Dakota Growers Pasta Co., New World Pasta Co., and American Italian Pasta Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Empire Energy Management Systems, Inc. v. James G. Roche, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- RHI Refractories Liaoning Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Meridian Products, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Stupp Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- International Custom Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Canadian Solar Int'l Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.