Legal Opinion
Isbell v. Heiny, Administrator
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided April 9, 1941No. 27,540PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichman, J.
This action was in replevin by appellant against an executor in his representative capacity to recover possession of property and $5,000 damages for its detention. The property was described as follows:
“Claim by Veneering Mfg. Co. of Goshen, Indiana, against Stineite Mfg. Co. of Ft. Wayne, Indiana, and insurance policy of National Credit Indemnity Co. covering loss of Veneering Mfg. Co. on claim; bonds and stock certificates owned by Dr. Shirts of Alexandria, Indiana; numerous papers, instruments, documents and letters of varying kinds and correspondence and files concerning each of the above…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Noble v. McGinnisIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Stout v. LaFolletteIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- State Ex Rel. Tuell v. Shelby Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
- Chaney v. WoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Bright National Bank v. HansonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
3Cited by14 opinions
- Vonderahe, Extr., Etc. v. OrtmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958
- Matter of Estate of WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- National Malleable & Steel Castings Co. v. GoodletCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Tinkham v. TinkhamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Ostheimer v. McNuttIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.