Legal Opinion

Schoniger v. Logan

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1920No. File No. 4666PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Alppeal from 'Circuit Court. Hon. Arva E. Tayror, Judge. Action by William Schoniger and another against Alma E. Logan and A. H. Maas; defendant H. C. Anderson intervening; to foreclose upon a contract for a deed to realty. From a judgment in favor of the intervenor, plaintiffs appeal. Appellants cited, intervention: Schoniger v. Logan, (S. D.) 166 N. W. 226; re Statute of Frauds: Sec. 1249, Rev. Code 1919; Ballou v. Carter, 30 S. D. 11.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOY, P. J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to bar and foreclose all the right, title, interest, and equities of the defendant Logan in and to certain lands situated in Spink county, under and by virtue of a written contract for a deed between plaintiffs and said defendant. There was no answer by defendant. Anderson, as an intervener alleged that after the commencement of this action the defendant Logan, in writing, for a valuable consideration, assigned and transferred to him all her right, title, and interest in and to said contract for deed, and that he as such assignee had tendered to plaintiffs all…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brandrup v. BrittenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Ballou v. BergvendsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Watters v. DanceySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Dal v. FischerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Jones v. PettigrewSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pannell v. Missouri Insurance Guaranty Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Peterson v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API