Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Peterson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1929No. File No. 6454PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MISER, C.

Respondent is the widow of Charles Peterson, who, at the time of his death, was a resident and landowner in Union county. Appellants are the daughters of 'Charles Peterson, and the executrices of his will. On respondent’s petition, the county court of Union county ordered appellants, who had filed no inventory of exempt property, to pay over to respondent the sum of $750 as .additional exemption allowed by Rev. Code 1919, § 3346, and the further sum of $50 per month for her support during administration, pursuant to section 3349. From this judgment of the county court the executrices…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Brandeis v. NeustadtlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  3. McAnnulty v. McAnnultyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Larsen v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Rowell v. BarberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reedy v. EbsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Weber v. WeberOhio Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API