Legal Opinion

In Re Fatsis

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 14, 2008No. 14-40227PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW WITH RESPECT TO TRUSTEE’S MOTION TO HOLD DEBTOR IN CONTEMPT FOR VIOLATION OF CONFIRMATION ORDER DATED MAY 13, 2004 AND FOR SANCTIONS

JOEL B. ROSENTHAL, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter came before the Court for an evidentiary hearing on the Chapter 7 Trustee’s “Motion to Hold Debtor in Contempt for Violation of Confirmation Order Dated May 13, 2004 and for Sanctions” [docket # 431] and the Debtor’s objection thereto [docket # 443]. The following constitutes the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr.P. 7052. For the reasons…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jamo v. Katahdin Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. In Re PaigeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2007
  3. Boyer v. GildeaDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2007
  4. Fitzgerald v. Beesley (In Re Beesley)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Warfield v. Salazar (In Re Salazar)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. In Re McGrahanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2011
  3. In re: Timothy Andrew Salazar and Gena Annette SalazarUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API