Fadgen v. Lenkner
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JONES, Chief Justice.
Appellee, James T. Fadgen, brought an action in trespass against appellant, George Lenkner, based upon the theory of criminal conversation. The complaint alleged that appellee and one Bonnie Hoch Fadgen were married in 1972 and that during the period of this marriage, the *275appellant, without the consent of appellee Fadgen, criminally conversed with Ms. Fadgen. Pursuant to Rule 1037(c) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, appellee moved the court below to enter judgment against appellant on the issue of liability based upon the latter’s written…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Tinker v. ColwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Singer v. SheppardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Kaczkowski v. BolubaszSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Freezer Storage, Inc. v. Armstrong Cork Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Hunt v. HuntSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Fabio v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.