Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Duffens v. Valenti

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 2008No. D050450PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

Plaintiffs and respondents Elaine M. Duffens, Sandra Mamell, and Sandy Shaulis (collectively respondents) brought an action against Irene C. Valenti, Valenti International Limited, LLC, and Valenti International Foundation, Inc. (collectively Valenti), for general, special, and treble damages based on allegations of fraud and statutory violations of Civil Code section 1694 et seq. in the individual matchmaking consulting agreements sold to them by Valenti. Section 1694 et seq., referred to here as the dating service statutes, prescribe certain standards and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Foster Poultry Farms v. Alkar-Rapidpak-MP Equipment, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2012
  2. Rosencrans v. Dover Images, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Tiri v. Lucky Chances, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Rice v. DownsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Toal v. TardifCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API