Legal Opinion

Donald v. Kell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1887No. 12,888PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Gibson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The appellant seeks to revive a judgment and enforce it against real estate owned by the appellee. The judgment upon which the complaint is based was rendered against the grantor of the appellee, and was rendered prior to his acquisition of title. The answer of the appellee alleges that the judgment was rendered on a promissory note executed by his grantor, Robert Duncan, and one Andrew J.. Lewis; that Duncan was adjudged a bankrupt, and a full discharge awarded him under the bankrupt act. The appellant replied that Duncan was the administrator of the estate of Alexander C. Donald, deceased,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clark v. . RowlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. Sorden v. GatewoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Simpson v. . SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  4. Owens v. BowieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1852
  5. Wade v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Guernsey-Newton Co. v. NapierWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Citizens Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GardnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. United States Credit Bureau, Inc. v. ManningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Chambers v. KirkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Gohld v. SvendsgaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API