Legal Opinion

Citizens Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Gardner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1946No. Docket No. 60, Calendar No. 42,647PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

Defendant Gardner, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, appeals from an order of the circuit court denying a motion to dismiss garnishment proceedings to enforce a judgment. The mo-, tion was based on a discharge in bankruptcy granted to defendant following the judgment. The question at issue is whether the defendant was released from liability on the judgment as a result of the proceeding in the bankruptcy court.

The plaintiff is a Michigan corporation and, for a number of years past, has been engaged in the writing of insurance oil motor vehicles. For some time prior to September, 1935,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brown v. HannaganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Guernsey-Newton Co. v. NapierWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. American Surety Co. v. McKiearnanMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. In Re the Contempt of PulverWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Morris v. CoveySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Gerald JOHNSON, Bankrupt, CARLISLE CASHWAY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gerald JOHNSON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  2. In Re Interstate Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  3. James Benjamin Hamby, Bankrupt v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Company, CreditorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  4. Holmes v. Kraus (In Re Kraus)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
  5. Cappella v. Little (In Re Little)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API