Legal Opinion · Dissent

Price v. Philadelphia Parking Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1966No. Appeal, 252Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno :

The Philadelphia Parking Authority, like all parking authorities, is empowered to erect public garages. As a matter of convenience and practicability a garage can rise only to a certain height which means that the space above that maximum altitude ordinarily remains unused. In 1961, the Pennsylvania Legislature realizing that this non-use amounted to a waste of construction area, amended the Parking Authority Law of 1947 to provide: “Nothing herein contained shall be construed to prohibit the sale or leasing by the Authority of the right to occupy…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Silsby Mfg. Co. v. AllentownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Spann v. Joint Boards of School DirectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Alexander v. Mayor and Bd. of AldermenMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Schwartz v. Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Potts v. City of UticaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API