Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Doria v. Ferguson
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1945No. 29797PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
No claim is made that the certificates furnished by relator were not satisfactory. The respondent resists' this action on two main grounds. For his first ground, he claims, in substance, that the furnishing of the described certificates by the relator to the Director of Highways, a state official, and the head of a governmental department, constituted the practice of law; that the director has such powers and such only as are conferred by statute; that Section 333, General Code, provides in part, that £<the Attorney General shall be the chief law officer for the state and all' its…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. DworkenOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Grievance Comm., Bar of New Haven County v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Gustafson v. v. C. Taylor & Sons, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
- Stephenson v. ConeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. CompManagement, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
- Yellow Cab of Cleveland, Inc. v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. DavieOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- CommuniCare, Inc. v. Wood County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Allerton Parking Corp. v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.