Legal Opinion
Timken-Detroit Axle Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 24, 1952No. 11580_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Chief Judge.
The petitioner, not being charged or found guilty of an unfair labor practice, seeks to restrain the enforcement of an order setting aside a representation election conducted under the provisions of Section 9 of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 159. The respondents counter with a motion to dismiss the petition on the ground that the Board’s order is not reviewable. Our order of April 14th, denying the petition, was suspended following request of the petitioner to be permitted to submit briefs bearing upon the effect of the Taft-Hartley Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 141…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Falk Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Amazon Cotton Mill Co. v. Textile Workers UnionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Norris, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Ohio Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
3Cited by12 opinions
- United Brick & Clay Workers of America v. Deena Artware, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- National Labor Relations Board v. SklarCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- National Labor Relations Board v. Vulcan Furniture Mfg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- The Morse Instrument Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- Daniel Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.