Legal Opinion
United Brick & Clay Workers of America v. Deena Artware, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 30, 1952No. 11403PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Circuit Judge.
The Appellee brought this action in the district court for damages, alleging in substance a secondary boycott by the Appellants in violation of the provisions of § 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, § 187, Title 29, U.S.C.A. A jury returned a verdict in favor of the Appellee in the sum of $29,985.85, upon which judgment was entered, followed by this appeal.
The Appellee, Deena Artware, Inc., hereinafter referred to as Deena, is engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling lamp bases at Paducah, Kentucky. The Appellant, The United Brick and Clay…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Crooks v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- The Procter & Gamble Independent Union of Port Ivory, N.Y. v. The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Painters District Council No. 38, Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators and Paperhangers of America, Afl-Cio v. Edgewood Contracting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United Mine Workers of America v. Meadow Creek Coal Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Consolidated Express, Inc. v. New York Shipping Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.