Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Bush v. Carden

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1932No. 7098PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lively, Judge:

Plaintiff sought, by notice of motion for judgment, to recover on a bond given by defendants in an injunction suit (Carden v. Bush, 109 W. Va. 655; 155 S. E. 914) ánd con ditioned upon defendants’ paying “all damages that may be sustained by any person by reason of the granting of the said injunction.” The trial court sustained defendants’ motion to strike out plaintiff’s evidence and directed a verdict favorable to defendants.

Before discussing the errors alleged by plaintiff, we first answer defendants’ inquiry as to whether an action on an injunction bond may be summarily…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Board of Highway Commissioners v. City of BloomingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Stuart v. CarterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Long v. Pence's CommitteeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  4. Wilson v. DawsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
  5. State Ex Rel. Meadow River Lbr. Co. v. Marguerite Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Shatzer v. Freeport Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Quintain Development, LLC v. Columbia Natural Resources, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Multiplex, Inc. v. Town of ClayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State Ex Rel. Stout v. RogersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Hyler v. WheelerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API