Wilson v. Dawson
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Hustings Court of the city of Roanoke rendered April 4, 1896, in a proceeding by motion on a contract wherein the defendant in error was the plaintiff, and the plaintiff in error was the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.
On the — day of November, 1894, E. A. Wilson & Co., styling themselves general contractors for the erection and construction of a public building for the United States in the city of Roanoke, *688entered into a contract under seal with Mrs. M. J. Dawson, through her agent, M. F. Normoyle, whereby she undertook to do all the foundation work of this building at prices for the masonry, excavation, and concrete work stipulated in the contract, payments for the work to be made by Wilson & Co. monthly, as the work progressed, but no time was specified in the contract within which the work was to be…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Steinman v. Clinchfield Coal Corp.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
- Stuart v. CarterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
- Smith's Adm'r v. Charlton's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1851
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. DukeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1908
- SEARLES'ADM'R v. Gordon's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.