Legal Opinion

State v. Rollinger

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 24, 1929No. 39845PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, C. J.

The only question on appeal that deserves consideration arises from the following facts: About April 1, 1928, two officers searched the dwelling house of the defendant, and found therein five bottles of intoxicating liquor. Before the commencement of the trial, the defendant filed a petition in the district court, asking that these bottles of liquor be returned to him, as they had been procured by illegal search and seizure. The court refused this petition, and on the trial of the case they were offered and received in evidence. When offered, they were objected to on the ground that they had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. TonnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  2. State v. RowleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  3. Joyner v. UtterbackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  4. State v. LamberttiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Lucia v. UtterbackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  3. State ex rel. Hanrahan v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  4. State v. BourgeoisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. Amended September 18, 2017 State of Iowa v. Christopher George StormSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API