Legal Opinion

Bailey v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 30, 1981No. 2 CA-CIV 4061PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

Petitioner Bailey is the defendant in a defamation action brought by the real party in interest, Castillo. Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment was denied and she has brought this special action to challenge this ruling. We believe special action intervention is appropriate since the challenged ruling is erroneous as a matter of law, Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Maricopa County Superior Court, 19 Ariz.App. 210, 505 P.2d 1383 (1973), and we therefore accept jurisdiction.

The parties agree that there is no material factual issue. They disagree only as to whether petitioner…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Drummond v. StahlCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  2. Jones v. TriceTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Sierra Madre Development, Inc. v. via Entrada Townhouses Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  4. Ginsburg v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  5. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Maricopa County Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Green Acres Trust v. LondonArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Burns v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. Sahara Gaming Corp. v. Culinary Workers Union Local 226Nevada Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Lewis v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. Franzi v. KoedykerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API