Braselton v. Vokal
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
Plaintiff brought the action to compel defendants, J. J. Vokal and Mary Vokal, to execute a conveyance to him' of a certain lot in the city of Chico, and he had judgment from which said defendants have appealed. The action was based upon a certain written instrument executed by said defendants in the following form: “For and in consideration of the sum of ten dollars, paid the undersigned, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, I agree to sell and convey to W. A. Braselton free from any lien and encumbrance whatever, on demand, within thirty days from date, at his option, the following…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Smith v. BanghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- National Hardware Co. v. SherwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Arnold v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Coles v. SoulsbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Harlow v. LeclairSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
- Palmer Ford, Inc. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Caras v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Wells Fargo Bank v. DowdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Chrisman v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.