Legal Opinion

Tele Atlas N v. v. NAVTEQ Corp.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 2, 2005No. C-05-01673 RMWPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

[Re Docket No. 24]

WHYTE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Tele Atlas N.V. and Tele Atlas North America (“Tele Atlas”) have sued defendant NAVTEQ Corporation (“NAV-TEQ”) for (1) violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1-2, (2) violation of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 14, (3) violation of California Business and Professions Code §§ 16720, 16726, 16727, and 17200, (4) intentional interference with contractual relations, and (5) intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. NAVTEQ moves to dismiss Tele…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sidibe v. Sutter HealthDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
  2. Feitelson v. Google Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  3. Uhlig LLC v. Corelogic, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API