Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Schilling

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1925No. Civil No. 2205PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

— This matter comes up on a motion for rehearing. There are three reasons assigned by the appellant in his motion. The first is substantially that the court erred in holding that the Land Department, being a body exercising judicial discretion and of limited jurisdiction, had no authority to set aside its own final decisions, unless the statute giving it judicial power specifically so provided. The second is that under the Laws of 1919, chapter 166, there is no longer any appeal from the decision of the state Land Commissioner to the Land Department, and that therefore the order of the state…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carr v. FifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. State v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Johnson v. BettsArizona Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Campbell v. CaldwellArizona Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commercial Life Ins. Co. v. WrightArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Magma Copper Co. v. Arizona State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Bettwy v. Black Canyon Greyhound Park, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  4. Alberts v. McGirkArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Peters v. BerrymanArizona Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API