Legal Opinion

State v. Board of Supervisors

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1912No. Civil No. 1278PublishedCited by 19 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Yavapai. F. 0. Smith, Judge. Application for writ of mandamus by the state, on the relation of the attorney general, against-the board of supervisors of Yavapai county. From an order sustaining the motion to quash the writ and sustaining a demurrer to the petition and dismissing the proceeding, the state appeals.

1Per curiam

This was an application by the state of Arizona, at the relation of the attorney general, for a writ of mandamus against the board of supervisors of Yavapai county and the clerk thereof. An alternative writ was issued, but upon motion by defendants was quashed and general demurrers to petition were sustained. It appears from the petition that before the third Monday of June, 1912, the United Yerde Copper Company’s properties were duly as*224sessed by the assessor of Yavapai county. That on July 20, 1912, the board of supervisors, while sitting as a board of equalization, gave a hearing to said…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hadley v. . MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. People v. GoldtreeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. State v. Board of County CommissionersNevada Supreme Court · 1869
  4. State v. C. P. R. R. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1891
  5. People v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Arizona Corp. Commission v. State Ex Rel. WoodsArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. Airesearch Mfg. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Brown v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Commercial Life Ins. Co. v. WrightArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Magma Copper Co. v. Arizona State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API