Legal Opinion

Earl Parris, Jr. v. 3M Company, et al.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided July 10, 2026No. 4:21-cv-00040Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION EARL PARRIS, JR. Individually, and on behalf of a Class of persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 4:21-CV-40-TWT 3M COMPANY, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This is an action under the Clean Water Act. It is before the Court on Defendant Daikin America, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 896]. For the following reasons, Daikin’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 896] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. Background1 1 The operative facts on the Motion for Summary…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Deal v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  5. Reginald Jones v. UPS Group FreightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API