Commonwealth v. Smith
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
The sole meritorious issue presented in this appeal is whether the representation of the appellant and his codefendants by a single attorney was such a conflict of interest as to be a denial of due process of law and effective assistance of counsel.
The case is before this Court from an Order denying appellant’s petition for post-conviction relief. Appellant was found guilty by the Honorable J. Frank McKenna, Jr., sitting without a jury, on charges of possession and use of narcotic drugs. A demurrer was sustained on the charge of dealing in narcotic drugs. Armed with an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Whitling v. RussellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. CullenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BurchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. BurchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. BurchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977