Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Smith

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 21, 1974No. Appeal, 226PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

The sole meritorious issue presented in this appeal is whether the representation of the appellant and his codefendants by a single attorney was such a conflict of interest as to be a denial of due process of law and effective assistance of counsel.

The case is before this Court from an Order denying appellant’s petition for post-conviction relief. Appellant was found guilty by the Honorable J. Frank McKenna, Jr., sitting without a jury, on charges of possession and use of narcotic drugs. A demurrer was sustained on the charge of dealing in narcotic drugs. Armed with an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Whitling v. RussellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Commonwealth v. CullenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BurchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. BurchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. BurchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API