Legal Opinion

Poole v. Sun Underwriters Insurance

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1937No. File No. 8030PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Plaintiff brought suit against the defendant to recover damages to his automobile in the sum of $¡500 upon an insurance policy issued by the defendant company. The policy con tains certain coverages. Among other things, damages occasioned by tornado, cyclone, windstorm, hail, earthquake, explosion, and water damage. (Italics burs.) There are also- certain terms in the policy couched in specific language, to the effect, “the car is insured' against accidental and external discharge of water excluding damage caused by rain, sleet, snow, flood.”

It appears that on the 5th day of July, 1934, there…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Lebrun v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Horton v. GoodenoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. McDaniel v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Miller v. Eastern Railway & Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Heller v. Fire Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. PaulsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. MATEER T/A SUMMIT HILL RADIO & TV v. Reliance Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  4. Southern Pacific Co. v. ProebstelArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Sun Underwriters Ins. Co. of New York v. BunkleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API