Nelson v. Agro Globe Engineering, Inc.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
ANDREASEN, Justice.
We granted Agro Globe Engineering, Inc.’s (AGE) application for further review from a decision of the court of appeals modifying the district court’s rewriting of a restrictive covenant in an employment agreement. We find neither the court of appeals nor the district court properly considered the restrictive covenant in the employment agreement between Dave Nelson and AGE. We vacate the decision of the court of appeals and reverse and remand to the district court with instructions.
I. Background, Facts and Proceedings.
AGE is a wholly owned subsidiary of SASS Enterprises,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hockenberg Equipment Co. v. Hockenberg's Equipment & Supply Co. of Des Moines, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- H. W. Gossard Co. v. CrosbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Matlock v. WeetsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Ernst v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Presto-X-Co. v. EwingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
3Cited by16 opinions
- Van Sloun v. Agans Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Condon Auto Sales & Service, Inc. v. CrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Passehl Estate v. PassehlSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- Northside Hospital, Inc. v. McCordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Sutton v. Iowa Trenchless, L.C.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.