Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Agro Globe Engineering, Inc.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 28, 1998No. 96-1929PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREASEN, Justice.

We granted Agro Globe Engineering, Inc.’s (AGE) application for further review from a decision of the court of appeals modifying the district court’s rewriting of a restrictive covenant in an employment agreement. We find neither the court of appeals nor the district court properly considered the restrictive covenant in the employment agreement between Dave Nelson and AGE. We vacate the decision of the court of appeals and reverse and remand to the district court with instructions.

I. Background, Facts and Proceedings.

AGE is a wholly owned subsidiary of SASS Enterprises,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hockenberg Equipment Co. v. Hockenberg's Equipment & Supply Co. of Des Moines, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  2. H. W. Gossard Co. v. CrosbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Matlock v. WeetsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  4. Ernst v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  5. Presto-X-Co. v. EwingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Van Sloun v. Agans Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. Condon Auto Sales & Service, Inc. v. CrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  3. Passehl Estate v. PassehlSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  4. Northside Hospital, Inc. v. McCordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Sutton v. Iowa Trenchless, L.C.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API