Legal Opinion

Passehl Estate v. Passehl

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 14, 2006No. 04-0874PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STREIT, Justice.

As the cynic Ambrose Bierce once said, “Death is not the end. There remains the litigation oyer the estate.” 1 Jerry and Volnetta Passehl claim the district court erred by enforcing a penalty provision in their settlement agreement with the Doris N. Passehl Estate (hereinafter “the Estate”). They now seek further review of the court of appeals’ decision affirming the district court’s ruling. Because we find the terms of the penalty provision were not met, we vacate the decision of the court of appeals and reverse and remand to the district court with instructions. ■

I. Facts…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fausel v. JRJ Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  2. Sille v. ShafferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  3. Davenport Osteopathic Hospital Ass'n v. Hospital Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  4. Waters v. PearsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. Owens v. BrownlieSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Van Sloun v. Agans Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. City of Riverdale, Iowa v. Allen Diercks, Marie Randol, and Tammie PictonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  3. Horsfield Materials, Inc. v. City of DyersvilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. Great Plains Real Estate Development, L.L.C. v. Union Central Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  5. Seneca Waste Solutions, Inc. Vs. Sheaffer Manufacturing Co., Llc And Sheaffer Pen Corporation, A Division Of Bic Usa Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API