Legal Opinion

Carrier v. Cameron

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1875PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Bay Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Graves, Ch. J.

Cameron sued the plaintiffs in error to recover against them on two notes of the following tenor:

“ $2,358 91. Cincinnati, June 9th, 1873.

Forty days after date, we promise to pay to the order of W. W. Corbit, twenty-three hundred and fifty-eight dollars and ninety-one cents, at Franklin Bank, Cincinnati, 0. Value received.

John Carrier & Co.”

“ $2,404 59. Cincinnati, June 9th, 1873.

Sixty days after date, we promise to pay to the order of W. W. Corbit, twenty-four hundred and four dollars and fifty-nine cents, at Franklin Bank, Cincinnati, 0. Value received.

John Carrier & Co.”

Each…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vallett v. ParkerNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  2. Dob & Dob v. HalseyNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  3. Smith v. Sac CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. The First National Bank v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Gansevoort v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1835

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. McLellan v. Detroit File WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Berry v. WhitneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Pease v. ColeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
  5. Lindh v. CrowleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API