Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. McEttrick

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 9, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

This action is to recover on a promissory note, signed by the defendant, payable to the plaintiff or ordér, for the sum of $400. The answer alleged that the note was without consideration; that it was for the debt of a corporation; and that it was “ repudiated by the defendant by written notice to the plaintiff.”

There was evidence that the plaintiff became the superintendent of the Summit Hospital on September 1, 1917; that the defendant “ personally had hired her ” (the plaintiff) ; that she understood Mr. McEttrick “ managed and run the hospital; that he was the only person from whom she…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Perley v. PerleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  2. Indiana Flooring Co. v. RudnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  3. Kirtley v. C. G. Galbo Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Mercantile Guaranty Co. v. HiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  5. Robertson v. RowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Codman v. BeaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. Westminster National Bank v. GrausteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Slotnick v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  4. Arlington Trust Co. v. PappalardoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1980
  5. Bay State Investors Inc. v. MilyaroMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API