Legal Opinion
Slotnick v. Smith
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 20, 1925PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
This is an action of contract to recover $2,122.33 with interest thereon, being the balance due the plaintiff for materials furnished and labor performed under a written contract between him and Robert A. Doyle & Company, Inc. The materials furnished and labor performed were in the construction of an apartment house by the Doyle company (the general contractor) under a contract with the defendants, who were the owners of the building.
On August 14, 1920, when the company made an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, the plaintiff held two of its notes for $1,000 each, which included a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hammond Coal Co. v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Griffin v. CunninghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Paul v. WilburMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Kirtley v. C. G. Galbo Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Pope & Cottle Co. v. WheelwrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Codman v. BeaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Tudor Press, Inc. v. University Distributing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Colpitts v. L. C. Fisher Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Kalker v. BailenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Fauci v. DenehyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.