United States v. Flores
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
Jaime Flores was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The Government presented circumstantial evidence against Flores, and a jury found him guilty as charged. Flores appeals his conviction and sentence. We hold that the district court committed no error, and we therefore AFFIRM.
I
Flores was indicted for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The indictment alleged that, having been convicted of a felony, he possessed a firearm on or around February 11, 2004 in Midland, Texas. He pled not guilty and was tried before a jury.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Tirado-TiradoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Pereneal KizzeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- Benjamin Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019