Legal Opinion
United States v. Pereneal Kizzee
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 15, 2017No. 16-20397PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARD C. PRADO,
Circuit Judge:
Defendant-Appellant Pereneal Kizzee was charged with possession of ammunition and firearms by a convicted felon (count one), possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver (count two), and possession of a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime (count three). Kizzee pleaded not guilty. At trial, the Government’s key witness was Detective Lance Schultz. The prosecutor asked Detective Schultz about questions he posed to a criminal suspect, Carl Brown, during an interrogation. In response to Detective Schultz’s questions, Brown…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Tennessee v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. Bekir BulucCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Christopher WaguespackCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Coy JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Fernando NoriaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Arturo SarliCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.