William Roger Davis, III v. State of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
*101 Pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851, counsel for William Roger Davis, III, a prisoner under sentence of death, appeals the postconviction court's order dismissing the postconviction proceedings below but not discharging counsel. For the reasons explained below, we affirm the postconviction court's order.
BACKGROUND
A jury convicted Davis of first-degree murder, kidnapping, and sexual battery. Davis v. State , 148 So.3d 1261 , 1264 (Fla. 2014). This Court's opinion on direct appeal explained the facts of the underlying crimes, which were committed in October 2009. Id. at…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hurst v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Timothy Lee Hurst v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851 and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.142Supreme Court of Florida · 2022