Sorge v. Dickie
Michigan Supreme Court
Cross-appeals from Wayne; Smith (Clement), J.,. presiding. Bill by Paul A. Sorge against Louise Dickie for the-specific performance of a land contract. From the decree rendered, both parties appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
The object sought by the bill of complaint herein was the specific performance of a land contract, entered into by the defendant as vendor .and the plaintiff as purchaser on June 10, 1915. The defendant had been the owner of 20 acres of land in the township of Greenfield, Wayne county, since about 1890. She, with her husband, Dr. James F. Dickie, had formerly lived in Detroit, but for 22 years they had lived in Berlin, Germany, where Dr. Dickie had' conducted the American Presbyterian church. They' came to Detroit in May, 1915, to sell defendant’s 20-acres of land. This land was situated…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ogooshevitz v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Eppstein v. KuhnIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Smith v. MathisMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Cughan v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
- Covell v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mettetal v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Ranck v. SpringerMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Frischkorn v. FitzgeraldMichigan Supreme Court · 1921