Legal Opinion

Peabody v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 11, 1925No. 2427; No. 2531PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Slices and chunks of pineapples put up in tins containing water, and classified by the collector as pineapples, prepared or preserved, not otherwise specially provided for, were assessed for duty at 2 cents per pound on the weight of the pineapples and water under that part of paragraph 746 of the act of 1922, which reads as follows:

746. Pineapples * * *; otherwise prepared or preserved, and not specially provided for, 2 cents per pound

The importers protested that the duty of 2 cents per pound should have been assessed by the collector upon the weight of the pineapples only and not on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  2. Newport Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Edenfruit Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  2. Marine Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  3. Bjelland, Lange & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  4. Esso Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  5. California Processed Fruit Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API